By Susan Burrows-Johnson, Galt Museum & Archives
As a museum worker, I have been confused
and concerned about the entanglement of social issues and community engagement
in museums. The current literature on
the future of museums directs workers to participate in the community to seek
remedies for injustice and troubles. Following this strategy is full of perceived risks such as mission-drift,
loss of financial support, a threat to scholarship, and insulting activists while
museums join an unsolvable civil society challenge.
Tangling participation and social issues
together as a strategy makes the prediction of the outcome feel difficult and
dangerous. It seems easier to understand
when the museums’ actions are described on two axis. A more explicit description of where a
museum, exhibit, or program chooses to be can be plotted in relationship to the
two choices.
Community engagement is on a continuum of
“little interaction” to “a great deal of community two-way participation”. At one end, the museum is very self-contained. In the middle of the continuum, the museum
seeks the community’s advice. The far
end of the continuum has the museum in a two-way, power-sharing relationship
with the community.
A social action continuum moves from "not
being a change agent" to seeking "a particular change or justice" in the
community. This museum continuum is, at
one end, object-focus to the other end of social issues focus.
The choice seems clear as we position a
museum, exhibit, or program with these characteristics. The lower left quadrant might be a
traditional small museum, focused on putting objects on display and telling
their stories. This museum does not ask
for advice, nor power-share with the community. The upper left quadrant is a museum choosing to seek a social change
without the community’s input. The
museum does the research and makes the conclusion that change is required.
Museums (or exhibits / programs) that choose
to engage the community are in the two quadrants on the right. The lower right quadrant would hold programs
or exhibits that invite community participation in delivering the museum’s
mission. A museum in this quadrant will
seek advice and participation without addressing social issues. The upper right quadrant contains the museum,
programs or exhibits that actively seek to deliver a social change sought by
the community. Power and control is
shared with the community.
To map the choice around the levels of
engagement and social change can provide more understanding and control over
the perceived risks. By clarifying, we
can guide our institutions to the relevant, useful purposes we intend rather
than rejecting any tools that might help us create public value.
The potential of Community-Engaged Museums (CEMs) to help achieve social change on a global scale – this despite limited resources and the push to reach new audiences.
ReplyDeleteCommunity Engaged Museums